Essay Writing Services

We provide best solutions to Essay Writing Services and possible questions students always ask.

QUESTION

Review the Daubert ruling. In laymen's terms, how does this ruling impact the investigation when forensic physical evidence has been tested and analyzed by a forensic biologist, chemist, or crime scene investigator? Can you suggest a challenge to the Daubert ruling? How would you defend that challenge? (The Daubert Ruling)
 
You can get Essay Writing Services at cluewriters.com at affordable price
 
 
ANSWER
Essay Writing Services

The Daubert Ruling

Expert witness evidence in U.S. national courts must meet the Daubert rule, created in a case known as the Daubert judgment. Essay Writing Services  According to the judgement, expert evidence should be founded on scientifically sound information mainly applicable to the existing circumstances.  Significant changes have occurred in investigating tangible forensic cues due to this judgement, which facilitated the emphasis on this factual legitimacy of forensic methodologies. 

Consequently, the forensic experts' practices have come under closer examination, and revised norms and regulations have been established for this industry. Upon the evaluation and processing of physical forensic evidence, the court may decline to admit their testimonies if experts fail to adhere to specific standards (Woody, 2016). Therefore, the Daubert judgment affects all inquiries.  The rules stipulate that these testimonies be pertinent to the existing issues. Besides ensuring the results' credibility, the testing and analysis procedures must be trustworthy.  

  It has been argued that the Daubert judgement exerts pressure on the prosecutors to establish the testimony's reliability. It might be challenging for prosecutors to prove the reliability of their material testing and analysis processes in court (Ousley & Hollinger, 2012). Essay Writing Services They also need to prove the reliability of the scientific analysis and laboratory testing they conducted. 

In order to navigate this obstacle, prosecutors must solidly grasp the scientific explanation behind the evidence examination and evaluation, which is not always the case.  The Daubert decision has been criticized in part because it might potentially disallow testimony that would be useful to investigators. In case a forensic expert discovers a murder weapon at the crime spot, the Daubert rule prohibits any application of DNA evidence from this weapon throughout the inquiry since it no one can connect it to a scientifically authentic foundation.

Order with Clue Writers to get an Essay Customized for you by cluewriters