Question
Annotated Bibliography. hi! the assign requires 4 peer-reviewed scholarly sources and 1 gray literature source. This assignment is a pre-assignment for a following assignment that i will be ordering after this one. so, i would prefer the same writer for both, is that okay?
Also, the sources should not come from the doi i provided. they should or can stem from the cited sources it uses. the goal is to answer a question such as, how is atmospheric CO2 fertilization is affecting fire regimes? It doesnt have to be this question but can be Annotated Bibliography.
- Type of paper: Essay (Any Type)
- Subject: Environmental Issues
- Number of pages: 1
- Number of cited resources: 1
- Type of service: Writing
doi.org/10.1002/fee.2359 Pausas, J. G., & Keeley, J. E. (2021). Wildfires and global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 19(7), 387-395. If possible, focus on how has atmospheric CO2 fertilization affect fire regimes?
Answer
Atmospheric CO2 fertilization Impact on Fire Regimes
Annotated Bibliography *Terrer, C., Jackson, R. B., Prentice, I. C., Keenan, T. F., Kaiser, C., Vicca, S. & Franklin, O. (2019). Nitrogen and phosphorus constrain the CO2 fertilization of global plant biomass. Nature Climate Change, 9(9), 684-689.
Terrier et al., (2019) experimented CO2 increase impacts in plants, according to enhanced CO2 (e CO2) experiments. However, the entire scope of these limits is unclear, making it impossible to anticipate how much CO2 plants can take up. Scientists analyzed data from 138 distinct e CO2 studies to assess the global effect of e CO2 on biomass. An experiment's estimate of e CO2 effect is consistent with historical increases in greenness but substantially lower than the model's. If the results are right, CO2's potential to encourage carbon storage may decline over the next century. Scientists can empirically measure biomass CO2 sensitivity, which helps constrain climate estimates (Annotated Bibliography).
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography *Malhi, Y., Lander, T., le Roux, E., Stevens, N., Macias-Fauria, M., Wedding, L., ... & Canney, S. (2022). The role of large wild animals in climate change mitigation and adaptation. Current Biology, 32(4), R181-R196.
Annotated Bibliography (Malhi et al., 2022) investigated the issue of fire regimes, atmospheric CO2, and proposed natural way to mitigate the problem. The author states that physicochemical and biological activities in forests impact planetary energetics, hydrologic cycle, and atmospheric composition. Complicated forest-atmosphere interactions may mitigate or intensify human-caused global warming.
Annotated Bibliography. Tropical, temperate, and boreal reforestation reduces global warming by sequestering carbon. Biogeophysical feedbacks may amplify or reduce this climatic forcing. Tropical forests cool the planet via evaporation, whereas boreal forests' low albedo is a climatic forcing. Temperate woodland evaporative impact is unknown. This and other processes' net climatic forcing is unknown. Global warming is putting huge strain on forests. To find and comprehend untapped feedbacks in the Earth system and the potential of forests to ameliorate climate change, interdisciplinary work is required. Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography
Annotated Bibliography *Reich, P. B., & Hobbie, S. E. (2013). Decade-long soil nitrogen constraint on the CO2 fertilization of plant biomass. Nature Climate Change, 3(3), 278-282.
(Reich & Hobbie, 2013) determined to measure if the nature and climate change article above, greater CO2 concentration increases plant development. Consequently, fertilization and carbon storage may reduce future CO2 rises and climate warming. However, nitrogen intake may affect plant biomass CO2 fertilization. Low soil nitrogen disposal limited the beneficial response of plant biomass to increased CO2 in the final span of a lasting recurrent grassland testing (1998–2000). (Annotated Bibliography)
Annotated Bibliography *Kolby Smith, W., Reed, S. C., Cleveland, C. C., Ballantyne, A. P., Anderegg, W. R., Wieder, W. R., ... & Running, S. W. (2016). Large divergence of satellite and Earth system model estimates of global terrestrial CO2 fertilization. Nature climate change, 6(3), 306-310.
(Smith et al., 2016) investigated strength of this crucial ecosystem function is uncertain. Positive reactions of crop production to increased atmospheric [CO2] that is, ‘CO2 fertilization'. New satellite-derived worldwide earthly NPP data demonstrate a considerable rise in NPP from 1982 to 2011. However, when compared to ESM NPP estimates, satellite-derived upsurges 2.8% are lesser than fifty percent of executable file rises 7.6 percent. The study shows that the discrepancy is because of an excess- vulnerability of ESMs to atmospheric [CO2], perhaps indicating an under- depiction of environmental reactions as well as of nutrient restrictions (Annotated Bibliography).
Annotated Bibliography *Drake, J. E., Gallet‐Budynek, A., Hofmockel, K. S., Bernhardt, E. S., Billings, S. A., Jackson, R. B., ... & Finzi, A. C. (2011). Increases in the carbon flux belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long‐term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecology Letters, 14(4), 349-357.
Drake’s ecology letter states that the planet's future climate is heavily reliant on variations in worldly C storing due to growing atmospheric CO2. Our results suggest increased CO2 levels stimulate microbial activity, speed earth biological substance breakdown, and boost tree absorption of N certain to SOM. Annotated Bibliography