History
- Home
- History
American History
Question 1
They both believe that no one should taint the individuality of anyone in the US. In
the first document, Roosevelt makes it clear that if an individual still shows signs that they
have ties to their country, America cannot consider them as 100 per cent American; therefore,
they are not citizens of this country. Similarly, in the second document, Roosevelt warns that
any immigrant who is not ready to meld in the image of this country then they are not 100%
American. He wants the ideal image of Americans. However, these arguments do not make
sense because the individual making them does not believe in individuality. Woody Guthrie
would significantly oppose the views portrayed in both documents. This poet is famous for
fighting for freedom. However, since these concepts do not allow people to enjoy their
liberty, Woody would oppose them.
Question 2
After going through the documents, one can see that even though the law clearly
stated that every citizen deserved equal treatment, that was never the case. One of the main
aspects that revealed this claim was false was racism. The minorities suffered significantly in
the south. Even though the law required equal treatment, they got the treatment of second-
class citizens. The industries hired people of colour in their organizations. However, these
people suffered considerably due to low pay and unfavourable working conditions. These
maltreatments show that even though the document was supposed to ensure everyone got
equal treatment in America, it was never the case.
In the seventh document, one can see an apparent inclination toward the learners who
were no longer thinking about discrimination based on one's race or bigotry. On the other
hand, the eighth document addresses the challenges minorities face in America because of the
hatred they get from white supremacists and discrimination in the criminal justice system. On
3
the other hand, the ninth document addresses the challenges people of colour face in the
workplace. For example, even though labour rights are in place to help deal with such
discrimination, white people defile these laws. These documents agree that people should not
act as if racism does not exist in America. The first step towards fighting this problem
involves recognizing that it exists. The second step entails working together towards solving t
whether one is a victim or not. The three documents are persuasive. One of the most
significant aspects that make work convincing is ethos. They have used their own experiences
to emphasize their points.
Question 3
Crystal Eastman and Alice Paul were the first to draft the Equal Rights Amendment.
This amendment was supposed to help fight discrimination in the US. It aimed to ensure
equal legal rights. It condemned discrimination based on sex. During this period, many men
and women had legal differences. Therefore, this amendment aimed to help deal with this
challenge. However, it received a lot of criticism because people still wanted to know what
these individuals meant when they talked about legal equality for women and men. This
debate has existed since 1921. The rise of women in America happened in the 1960s,
supporting its amendment significantly.
Women wanted it because they knew its enactment would help deal with women's
oppression in the US. The US representative Martha Griffiths played a significant role in this
amendment's enactment. On October 12, she introduced it, and after considerable analysis,
the US Senate approved it in 1972. Moreover, the House of Representatives saw it as a
necessary tool to help bring equality among men and women; therefore, it approved it. After
the approval, the state legislatures were supposed to ratify it. However, things did not go as
planned. The legislatures never ratified it for various reasons. One of the main reasons was
that men were scared that they would start focusing on house chores. They wanted women to
4
continue being their subordinates taking care of the children and their husbands; however,
this ratification would change that.
The Title IX Education Amendments 1972 significantly help promote the place of
women in society. It was signed into law in 1972. Women were facing significant
discrimination in the education system, and it was supposed to help with that. However, it
only applied to programs that were benefiting from financial assistance. That was to
guarantee that schools did not engage in activities that promoted sexism. If the legislatures
ratified the ERA, it would not
Place your order